Step 3: Advertising the Position to Generate a Diverse Applicant Pool

The purpose of this step is to make sure the position is marketed toÌýreach,Ìýappeal to, andÌýwelcomeÌýmembers of underrepresented groups.

In Step 1,Ìýwe emphasized the importance of designing the position such that it is more likely to drawÌýapplicants who are members of underrepresented groups. Yet even the most carefully constructed position will only succeed in generatingÌýa widely representative applicant pool if itÌýis advertised in a way that reflects and supports the unit's commitment to inclusive excellence.

For strategies to ensure the position is advertised with attention to the principles of inclusive excellence, seeÌý,Ìýlocated inÌý¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ's Faculty Search Process Manual.

Two Strategies for GeneratingÌýa Diverse Applicant Pool

Ìý 1. ÌýUse inclusive language in the position announcement:

Research has shown that the vocabulary in a position announcement affects the degree to which the announcementÌýappealsÌýto members of variousÌýsocial groups.ÌýFor information on how to avoid exclusive wording in a position announcement, please see , which is locatedÌýin ¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ's Faculty Search Process Manual.

In addition, there are software tools—referred to as augmented writing programs—designed to analyze the inclusivity of position-announcement vocabulary. For a list of such programs, seeÌý. The hiring committeeÌýshould consider using one of theseÌýresources.Ìý

For an annotated exampleÌýof an inclusive position announcement, seeÌý,Ìýwhich is locatedÌýin ¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ's Faculty Search Process Manual.Ìý

Ìý 2. ÌýEnsure that the position announcement reachesÌýapplicants outside of the unit's existing networks:Ìý

Even the most inclusiveÌýposition announcement will only generate a diverse applicant pool if it is circulated broadly and with attention to reaching prospective applicants who are members of underrepresented groups.Ìý

For information on how to ensure wide and inclusive dissemination of the position announcement,Ìýplease see ,Ìýwhich is locatedÌýin ¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ's Faculty Search Process Manual.Ìý

For a list of recommendedÌýadvertising sources, please seeÌý,Ìýwhich is locatedÌýin ¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ's Faculty Search Process Manual.Ìý

The hiring committee shouldÌýalso meetÌýwith the Diversity and Inclusive Excellence UnitÌýinÌýHuman Resources to brainstormÌýstrategies forÌýreaching potential applicants

Finally, the hiring committee should communicate closelyÌýwith the Affirmative Action Officer in Human Resources to evaluate theÌýdemographic composition of the applicant pool and toÌýdetermine whetherÌýbenchmarks for specificÌýfields are being met.ÌýOneÌýsuch consultation should occurÌýhalfway through the application phase of the faculty-search process.ÌýAÌýsecondÌýshould take placeÌýafter all applications have been received.

RequestÌýDiversity Statements in the Position Announcement

TheÌýhiring committee should requestÌýdiversity statementsÌýinÌýthe application-instructions section ofÌýthe position announcement.

Diversity statements giveÌýapplicants a platform to demonstrate that, if hired, theyÌýwill actively fosterÌýinclusivity and equitabilityÌýwithin the unit. Whether or not they areÌýmembers of underrepresented groups, applicants can use the diversity statement to express their commitment to the principles of inclusive excellence, to communicate their knowledge about structural inequity, andÌýto demonstrate ways in whichÌýthey have put theirÌýcommitment to inclusivity and equitabilityÌýinto action.Ìý

Applicants who are members of underrepresented groups might also use their diversity statements to articulateÌýhow their positionality hasÌýinformed their understanding of structural inequityÌýand their commitment toÌýredressingÌýdisparities inÌýrepresentationÌýwithinÌýacademic professions.

Not all applicants who are members of underrepresented social categories will, however, want to shareÌýintimate information about their lived experiences and identities. Nor should they be expected to.ÌýIt is therefore imperative that the hiring committee formulatesÌýdiversity-statement prompts that welcomes deeplyÌýpersonal responses without treatingÌýthem asÌýmandatory or preferable. There are a lot of effective ways to approach a diversity statement. Some people choose to go with raw self-expression. Others opt to focus solelyÌýon how their research and/or service have promotedÌýinclusivity and equitability.Ìý

There is no singleÌýbest approach to writingÌýa diversity statement.

But whereÌýadversity is concerned,Ìýapplicants can benefit by revealingÌýprivate aspects of their lives. The diversity statementÌýprovides applicants with an opportunity, if they so choose,Ìýto discuss ways in which adversity has shapedÌýtheir professional trajectories. Whether or not they are members of underrepresented groups, most people can point to challenges they have had to overcome in the process of pursuing their career goals. Yet someÌýface far more daunting obstaclesÌýthan others. Because structural inequity so profoundly affects access to opportunities, adversity can intersectÌýwith social representation in complex and influential ways. And this is where traditional measures of accomplishment—the CV for example—can fail to adequately represent candidates' actual qualifications. Privilege often correlates with opportunity.ÌýAs such, a highlyÌýqualified candidate who has overcome tremendous adversityÌýmight not have as impressive a CV as a highlyÌýqualified candidate who has enjoyedÌýgreaterÌýprivilege.ÌýTo comprehensively and accurately assess an applicant'sÌýaptitude to excel as a faculty member—which is, after all, the ultimate purpose of a job search—an equitable hiring committee must considerÌýnot only thatÌýapplicant's documentedÌýachievements to date but also the obstacles that the applicant has facedÌýin the process of accomplishing those achievements. Furthermore, experiencesÌýofÌýadversity shapeÌýperspective.ÌýThough not easily transposed onto a CV, the knowledge that a person gains when confronting great difficultyÌýcan be a powerful career asset and educationalÌýtool.Ìý

And there are additionalÌýreasons why extremely qualifiedÌýcandidates who are also membersÌýof underrepresented groups might sometimes not appearÌýas accomplishedÌýon paper as their overrepresented counterparts.ÌýAs mentioned in Step 2, members of underrepresented social categories, particularly those who identify asÌýBIPOC, often bear a higher burden of service than their overrepresented colleagues. Service is time consumingÌýand can impede the project of building up other, more traditionally illustrious, lines on the CV.ÌýFurthermore,Ìýmembers of underrepresented groups frequently fulfill important service roles thatÌýcannot be incorporated into aÌýCV. Consider, for example, theÌýexperiential and social value ofÌýmentoringÌýundergraduate students who are themselves members of underrepresented groupsÌýorÌýadvocating for socialÌýjustice. Are these somehow less meaningful pursuitsÌýthan publishing thatÌýadditional essay?ÌýFinally, when serviceÌýis reflected on a CV, hiring authorities often weigh it lightlyÌýin relation to other achievements. So again, traditionalÌýmeasurements of candidates' success—tools such as the CV—areÌýneither objective nor comprehensive. And to treat them as suchÌýis to reproduceÌýsystemic inequity.

Affirmative actionÌýis absolutely not about choosing less qualified candidates to fill categorical quotas. Accusations of such operate on an assumption thatÌýcandidates who are members of overrepresented groupsÌýare inherently more qualified than candidates who are members of underrepresented groups. Affirmative actionÌýis about realizing the degree to which discrimination and structural inequity saturateÌýevery stage of the hiring process—not to mention the pipeline leading to it. Affirmative actionÌýis aboutÌýrecognizing how traditional measures of success can fall short in identifying qualified candidates. It is about understanding how such measuresÌýperpetuateÌýsystems of inequity andÌýpreventÌýhighlyÌýqualified candidates from receiving the acknowledgement they deserve.ÌýAffirmative actionÌýis not about lowering standards but, rather, about recognizing and dismantling institutional tools of exclusion and oppression.ÌýTo effectively implement affirmative action, hiring authorities must have a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of systemic inequity so they do not fall into the condescendingÌýtrap of tokenizing members of underrepresented groups.Ìý

As mentioned above,Ìýnot all applicants will want to divulge deeply personal aspects of their lives and identities. Some may worry, and with good cause, that sensitive information couldÌýbe used against them. It is thereforeÌýthe hiring committee's responsibility to cultivate trust with the language it uses in the position announcement and in the diversity-statement prompt(s). The committee must also honor that trust duringÌýthe evaluation phase of the faculty-search process. When applicants expose intimate aspects of their lives so early in the hiring process, they are especially vulnerable to implicit and explicit biases. It is therefore crucial that the hiring committee is equipped to recognize and counteract such biases. In other words, if theÌýhiring committee solicits diversity statements in the application-instructions section of the position announcement, the committeeÌýmust be composed and prepared such that itÌýembodies the unit'sÌýcommitment to inclusive excellence (see Step 2).Ìý

A Two-Pronged Approach to the Diversity-Statement Prompt

To best gauge both an applicant's commitment to inclusivityÌýand experiences of adversity, the hiring committee should askÌýapplicants to respond to two separate prompts. The first such prompt shouldÌýaskÌýapplicants to discuss ways in which they have worked to promoteÌýthe principles of inclusivity and equitabilityÌý(within and/orÌýoutside of the academy). The second prompt shouldÌýask applicants to discuss challenges that have shaped their professional trajectories and influenced their worldviews. Broadly worded, these prompts allow applicants to decide whether toÌýdivulgeÌýor withhold sensitive information. Although the second prompt is more personal, it still leaves space for applicants to choose whichÌýlife experiences they are comfortable sharing.

Refrain from Soliciting Letters of Recommendation in the Position Announcement

Just as the languageÌýused in a job announcement will affect how potential applicants perceive the position, the vocabularyÌýin a letter of recommendation can influence how decisionmakers perceive an applicant.Ìý

Studies have shown that implicit biases can profoundly affect how letter writers depict applicants. For specific examples, please seeÌýAppendix Five:ÌýExamples of Bias in the Hiring ProcessÌýinÌý, which is located in ¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ's Faculty Search Process Manual.

BecauseÌýletters of recommendationÌýoften reflectÌýimplicit biases, the hiring committee should refrain from soliciting themÌýat least until after the committee has completed its first—or even second—round of evaluations. If and when the committee does solicit letters of recommendation, committee members should remain highly cognizant of the ways in which implicit biases may permeateÌýthese problematic evaluative materials.

For more on the importanceÌýof advertising the position to attract a diverse candidate pool, see theseÌýexternal resources.Ìý

Ìý