Published: June 20, 2012

Companies paying celebrities big money to endorse their products may not realize that negative perceptions about a celebrity are more likely to transfer to an endorsed brand than are positive ones, according to a new 精品SM在线影片 study.

Celebrity endorsements are widely used to increase brand visibility and connect brands with celebrities鈥 personality traits, but do not always work in the positive manner marketers envision, according to Margaret C. Campbell of CU-Boulder鈥檚 Leeds School of Business, who led the study.

鈥淚n three different studies, negative celebrity associations always transferred to an endorsed brand, even under conditions when positive associations did not,鈥 said Campbell, an associate professor of marketing. 鈥淭he overall message to marketers is be careful, because all of us, celebrities or not, have positives and negatives to our personalities and those negatives can easily transfer to a brand.鈥

Campbell and Caleb Warren of the Universita Commerciale Luigi Bocconi in Milan, Italy, reported their findings in the current issue of the journal Social Influence.

In one study, participants were asked to read several celebrity news stories, including one short piece about pop singer and reality TV star Jessica Simpson and a brand she was endorsing. An earlier test had revealed that consumers had both positive (sexy and fun) and negative (ditsy and weak) associations with the star. When participants were later asked to evaluate a variety of products, including the brand Simpson endorsed, the researchers found participants were likely to think of the brand as both ditsy and weak and sexy and fun.

鈥淗owever, when the endorsed product wasn鈥檛 a good match with the celebrity, in this case Jessica Simpson endorsing a pocketknife, the celebrity鈥檚 positive associations of sexy and fun did not transfer to the brand, while her negative associations did,鈥 Warren said.

The fact that an endorsed brand is likely to take on the same negative traits as the celebrity means that marketers need to consider all facets of any potential endorser, according to Campbell.

鈥淢arketers often focus on the traits that they want without also considering whether the celebrity has traits that they do not want to be associated with their brands,鈥 she said.

They also must give careful thought as to whether to continue with a celebrity endorser when the endorser does something that causes him or her to accumulate strong, negative traits in consumers鈥 eyes.

鈥淭he global company Accenture, for example, chose to sever endorsement ties with Tiger Woods shortly after his extramarital affairs came to light,鈥 Campbell said. 鈥淭his new research indicates this helped lower the risk of gaining associations with disloyalty and lack of commitment rather than high performance.鈥

With celebrities often in the news for negative reasons, one might ask why companies continue to use them as endorsers.

鈥淥ftentimes, too often, brand managers measure attention and celebrity and forget to measure the overall attitude and personality traits that are garnered by the brand,鈥 Campbell said. 鈥淪o I think part of it is the lack of considering all of the positives and negatives that can occur with a celebrity.鈥澨

Contact:
Margaret C. Campbell, Leeds School of Business, 303-735-6305
Greg Swenson, CU media relations, 303-492-3113

鈥淚n three different studies, negative celebrity associations always transferred to an endorsed brand, even under conditions when positive associations did not,鈥 said Margaret Campbell, an associate professor of marketing at CU-Boulder鈥檚 Leeds School of Business. 鈥淭he overall message to marketers is be careful, because all of us, celebrities or not, have positives and negatives to our personalities and those negatives can easily transfer to a brand.鈥