¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ

I. Procedural Statement

This document is intended to serve as formal guidance for ¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ regarding the use of funds from sponsored projects for conference costs in like circumstances. The university is committed to ensuring costs incurred in support of sponsored research are allowable, reasonable, and allocable to a particular sponsored award, as defined by U.S. Office of Management and Budget’s Uniform Guidance (); are in compliance with sponsor requirements; and are administered consistently across the campus for all sponsored research. Procedural statements support the ¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ Cost Principles Policy by providing definitions and processes for meeting those standards in like circumstances.

II. Defintions

Conferences and conference costs are defined and described as allowable in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget’s Uniform Guidance, as:

A conference is defined as a meeting, retreat, seminar, symposium, workshop or event whose primary purpose is the dissemination of technical information beyond the non-federal entity [¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ] and is necessary and reasonable for successful performance under the federal award.

III. Procedures

A. Federal Awards

Allowable Costs

When the non-federal entity (¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ) is a sponsor or host of a conference, the following items may be charged to the sponsored project as allowable costs: rental of facilities, speakers’ fees, costs of meals and refreshments, local transportation, and other items incidental to such conferences, unless further restricted by the terms and conditions of the awarding sponsor. Some sponsors provide conference funding in the form of participant support. allows for the awarding sponsor to authorize exceptions where appropriate for programs including Indian tribes, children, and the elderly. The university’s  (section II.E of APS 4015 - Propriety of Expenses) can help evaluate the appropriateness of an expense.

Appropriate Documentation for Allowable Costs

In order to be compliant with the Uniform Guidance definition of a conference, documentation must be maintained by the department and should substantiate that the primary purpose was to disseminate technical information beyond ¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ.

Documentation may include, but is not limited to, the following:

• A detailed explanation of the primary purpose of the conference, which must be the dissemination of technical information beyond ¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ and must have a programmatic purpose that is necessary and reasonable to the successful performance of the award
• A copy of the conference agenda to substantiate the primary purpose
• A list of all registered attendees, both university and non-university
• If the conference was a public event not requiring registration, proof of advertising beyond ¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ
• In cases where costs per person exceed a typical per diem reimbursement for the conference location, provide justification for local transportation, rental of facilities, meals and refreshments, or other incidental costs necessary for this conference

Unallowable Costs

Costs associated with intra-campus and interdepartmental meetings are unallowable as a conference cost because the Uniform Guidance defines conferences as having a primary purpose of disseminating technical information beyond the non-federal entity (¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ and the related project team, even if located at different institutions or campuses).

Lunch meetings with collaborators and departmental retreats are unallowable as a conference cost, as they do not satisfy the definition of disseminating technical information beyond ¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ and the related project team, even if located at different institutions.

Alcohol costs are unallowable when paid for through sponsored project funding. Under the guidelines imposed by the Uniform Guidance, the cost of identifying, but not providing, locally available dependent-care resources for travel to conferences is allowed only if there is an institution-wide policy that these costs are allowed. ¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ does not currently have a policy that provides this benefit to faculty and staff. Therefore, it is not allowable to charge dependent care costs to a sponsored research project.

B. Non-Federal Awards

Section of the Uniform Guidance requires that we apply our policies and procedures uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the university. Therefore, ¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ’s Cost Principles Policy, and related procedural statements, are also applicable to non-federal awards. The basic criteria for charging conference costs are similar for non-federal sponsored projects, but it is also important to be familiar with the particular requirements or restrictions of each non-federal sponsor. When allowed by the non-federal sponsor, a written justification for the inclusion of conference costs should be provided in order to explain why these are necessary to fulfill the research objective of the project, and to ensure that the cost directly benefits the project being charged, even when the non-federal sponsor may follow more flexible spending guidelines.

C. Process

At Proposal

The conference cost should be identified in the proposal budget justification, and justified as to why it is necessary and allocable to the performance of the award. At the proposal stage, OCG proposal analysts will analyze proposed conference budget costs for cost allowability and reasonableness. Inclusion in the budget justification is intended to enable the sponsor to review and concur with the need for the cost. Written justification and/or approval is meant to prevent questions regarding the allowability of costs in the event of an audit.

After an Award is Funded

In the event that an unbudgeted conference cost is required after an award is funded, the PI should work directly with their OCG grant or contract officer to review proposed conference costs for allowability and reasonableness, and to explain the benefit of this cost and obtain prior approval from the awarding sponsor. The written sponsor approval as well as the justification explaining the purpose and benefit of the conference to the specific project will be retained in Boulder eRA (BeRA). Supporting documentation should include the items listed in Section III.A. above and should be retained by the department for future reference should the expenditure be questioned at a later date.

If there are significant changes to the proposed conference between proposal and implementation, the costs may become unallowable, the conference costs will need to be re-reviewed by the OCG grant or contract officer, and additional justification will be required. Examples of what might constitute a significant change include changes to the purpose or scope of the conference, or a change to the composition or numbers in the attendee list.

FAQs