Electric Vehicles

Recent research in this area is directed at substantially reducing the loss of drivetrain power electronics over standard EPA drive cycles. These gains are achieved through a new composite converter approach, with demonstrated reduction in average loss by a factor of 2-4. Earlier research includes power conversion for on-board chargers and for facilitation of a 42 VDC standard.

Composite Converter Architectures: Beyond Multilevel Modular Conversion

Distribution (PDF) of electric vehicle DC bus voltage and power for a simulated US06 (aggressive) drive cycle, where there is an upwards trend of normalized IP as V increases.

Distribution (PDF) of electric vehicle DC bus voltage and power for a simulated US06 (aggressive) drive cycle.

Electric vehicles operate most of the time at 10% to 20% of their rated power. Typically, converter efficiency is relatively low at these operating points. There is an opportunity to substantially reduce the loss of the drive train power electronics over typical drive cycles, thereby reducing temperature rise, cooling system load and improving MPGe.
  1. H. Chen, K. Sabi, H. Kim, T. Harada, R. Erickson, and D. Maksimovic,  IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, Sept. 2014.
  2. H. Chen, K. Sabi, H. Kim, T. Harada, R. Erickson, and D. Maksimovic, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 101-110, Jan. 2016.
    Conference paper [1] and updated journal paper [2] describe a new composite converter approach and its application to electric vehicle drivetrains.
  3. H. Kim, H. Chen, D. Maksimovic, and R. Erickson,  IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, Sept. 2015.
    This paper documents design and experimental results of a 30 kW boost composite converter for an electric drivetrain application.
  4. Graph comparing efficiency vs. power for conventional boost vs. composite converter, where the efficiency of a composite converter increases exponentially starting at 3 kW and levels around 97%, and a conventional boost begins to exponentially increase at 0 kW and maximizes at 98% efficiency.

    Comparison of efficiency vs. power for conventional boost (solid line) vs. composite (experimental data points), 250 V : 650 V, 30 kW rated converters. It is remarkable that 98% efficiency is maintained down to nearly zero power.

    H. Chen, H. Kim, R. Erickson, and D. Maksimovic,  IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics Jan. 2017.
    Options for performing the boost function in EV drivetrains are compared using a calibrated loss model, to predict total loss over standard EPA drive cycles, as well as size of the reactive elements. The composite converter approach reduces the loss over typical drive cycles by a factor of approximately four, while also reducing the size of the system film capacitors.
  5. U. Anwar, H. Jin, H. Chen, R. Erickson, D. Maksimovic, and K. Afridi,  IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, Sept. 2016.
  6. H. Kim, H. Chen, D. Maksimovic, and R. Erickson,  IEEE Energy Conversion Conference and Exposition, Sept. 2016.
  7. H. Kim, H. Chen, Z. Cole, B. Passmore, K. Olejniczak, R. Erickson, and D. Maksimovic,  IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference, Mar 2017.
  8. H. Kim, H. Chen, J. Zhu, D. Maksimovic, and R. Erickson,  IEEE Workshop on Wide Bandgap Power Devices and Applications, Nov. 2016.

Earlier Work Related to Vehicle Power Electronics

  1. J. Hong, D. Maksimovic, R.W. Erickson, and I. Khan, 鈥淗alf-Cycle Control of the Parallel Resonant Converter Operated as a High Power Factor Rectifier鈥, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-8, January 1995.

  2. Stephen W. Anderson, Robert W. Erickson, and Ronald A. Martin, 鈥淎n Improved Automotive Power Distribution System Using Nonlinear Resonant Switch Converters,鈥 IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, January 1991.

  3. Stephen W. Anderson, Robert W. Erickson, and Ronald A. Martin, 鈥淎n Improved Automotive Power Distribution System Using Nonlinear Resonant Switch Converters,鈥 IEEE/SAE Workshop on Automotive Power Electronics, August 1989.
  4. Robert Erickson, Adan Hernandez, Arthur Witulski, and Renjie Xu,  IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 1989 Record, pp. 43-50, June 1989. Also in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 4 no. 2, April 1989, pp. 242-252.